unifi_unblock_client
Unblock a client that was previously blocked on a UniFi AP by providing its MAC address.
Instructions
Unblock a previously blocked client by MAC address.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mac | Yes | ||
| site_id | No | default |
Unblock a client that was previously blocked on a UniFi AP by providing its MAC address.
Unblock a previously blocked client by MAC address.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mac | Yes | ||
| site_id | No | default |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states action without disclosing side effects, permission requirements, or post-unblock behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, but could include more context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and only two parameters poorly explained. Fails to inform agent about return values, errors, or workflow implications.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage 0%. Description adds meaning for 'mac' (unblock by MAC) but ignores 'site_id' entirely. No parameter descriptions in schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Unblock' and resource 'client', distinguishing it from sibling tools like unifi_block_client. Specifies 'by MAC address' adding specificity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like unifi_block_client or unifi_kick_client. Does not mention prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/haiduongacm/unifi-ap-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server