Get speed tiers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool returns sorted data and uses a current meta seed/source, which implies a read-only operation. However, it lacks details about side effects, error handling, or how the seed is determined, so transparency is limited.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the core functionality. Every word earns its place, with no unnecessary filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has moderate complexity due to the filters parameter, and although an output schema exists, the description is too brief to explain what 'speed benchmarks' means, how the meta seed/source is selected, or how the filters interact. This is inadequate for an agent to fully understand when and how to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 67%, with descriptions for limit and includeModifiers, but the filters parameter is undocumented. The description adds no parameter information at all, failing to clarify the complex filters structure. This leaves a significant gap in understanding the tool's inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns sorted speed benchmarks from the current meta seed/source, using a specific verb and resource. It is relatively specific but does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools like optimize_speed_spread, which could also involve speed benchmarks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only states what it does, without mentioning when it is appropriate or when to choose a sibling tool like get_meta_snapshot or optimize_speed_spread.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.