Skip to main content
Glama
h3ro-dev

Cursor Admin MCP Server

by h3ro-dev

Related Servers

Alternatives to Cursor Admin MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps Cursor Enterprise API to enable AI agents to answer questions about team spending, usage, and model adoption.
      17
      23 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides detailed information about your development environment to the Cursor code editor, enabling more context-aware assistance.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to query RevenueCat's subscription analytics API using natural language, retrieving metrics like MRR, churn, and revenue.
      3
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables SQL analytics on DuckDB and MotherDuck databases, allowing AI assistants and IDEs to query and analyze data.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_daily_usage_data focuses on usage metrics, get_spending_data on financial data, and get_team_members on personnel information. There is no overlap in functionality or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' as the prefix, followed by a descriptive noun phrase (e.g., daily_usage_data, spending_data, team_members). This uniformity makes the tools predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for an admin server, as it lacks operations like update, create, or delete for team members or spending. While the tools cover key read-only functions, the scope suggests more administrative actions would be expected.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for an admin domain, offering only read operations (get) without any ability to modify data, manage users, or handle configurations. This creates significant gaps that will limit agent effectiveness in administrative tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues