spotify_create_radio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It explains the sampling mechanism but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether playlist is saved), authentication requirements, or constraints on seed URIs. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence of 15 words. No unnecessary words; every part earns its place. Ideal conciseness for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, an output schema, and the tool's creative nature, the description omits important context: format of seed_uri, meaning of limit, and what the output playlist contains. It is too brief to be fully actionable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, baseline is 4. The description adds that seed_uri is a track or artist URI, but does not explain the other parameters (name, limit). Thus it partially compensates but is incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a radio-style playlist from a seed track or artist, using sampling of related catalogs. It effectively distinguishes from siblings like spotify_vibe_playlist or spotify_playlist_radio by specifying the method.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for generating a radio based on a seed, but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives like spotify_discover_by_artist or spotify_playlist_radio. No when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.