Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to spotify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Spotify Web API — gives Claude and other AI assistants tools to search music, control playback, manage playlists, library, and podcasts.
      59
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A FastMCP server that exposes Spotify's catalog and user context as tools for Claude, enabling track search, audio features, artist discography, recommendations, currently playing, and playlist creation.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Spotify that enables playlist building and music discovery through 19 tools, allowing LLM agents to search tracks/artists/albums, manage playlists, control playback, and access personal listening data.
      20
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides intelligent playlist curation tools using Spotify track data and audio feature analysis. It enables AI assistants to create mood-based playlists, find similar songs, analyze audio characteristics, and curate personalized music collections.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables you to manage your personal Spotify library from Claude or a CLI, including organizing playlists, merging and deleting playlists, saving tracks, searching with artist verification, and querying top tracks, artists, and recently played items.
      27
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 93 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping boundaries, such as spotify_status vs spotify_now_playing, spotify_play vs spotify_resume, spotify_cleanup_playlist vs spotify_deduplicate_playlist, and spotify_playlist_diff vs spotify_playlist_compare. Descriptions provide enough detail to distinguish most tools with careful reading, but the large number of closely related playlist and discovery functions creates genuine misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a consistent spotify_verb_noun pattern (e.g., spotify_get_devices, spotify_create_playlist, spotify_skip_next). There are a few noun-phrase exceptions like spotify_playlist_analysis, spotify_playlist_vibe, and spotify_library_stats, but these are still readable and do not break the overall convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    93 tools is extreme for any MCP server, far beyond the 3–15 well-scoped range. While the Spotify API is broad, this surface would overwhelm agents and makes selection, navigation, and maintenance unnecessarily difficult. The count alone is a strong negative signal.

    Completeness3/5

    Core playback, library, playlist, and discovery workflows are well covered, and custom curation tools add significant value. However, there are notable omissions like removing tracks from a playlist, deleting/unfollowing playlists, unsaving tracks/albums/episodes/shows, and unfollowing artists/users, which create dead ends in standard lifecycle flows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive