Skip to main content
Glama
grzegorzkowalskigk-jpg

mcp-ledger-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-ledger-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and inspect an invoice ledger, generate VAT summaries, run OCR on local documents, and use reusable prompts for chasing overdue invoices and reconciling entries.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audit infrastructure for AI agents to log consequential decisions (invoice, GL, anomaly) and verify attestations via MCP tools.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create accounts, record balanced double-entry transactions, query balances, and reconcile accounts against a SQLite-backed ledger through four MCP tools.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered invoice analysis and reasoning: given invoice fields, it detects missing data, inconsistencies, duplicates, and proposes actions (register, request data, mark duplicate, review) using deterministic rules.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to parse and analyze PDF invoices, including text, field, and table extraction, OCR for scanned documents, ZUGFeRD support, compliance validation, and batch processing via MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate a self-hosted financial platform over MCP, managing books, expenses, revenues, settlements, payments, accounts, categories, transfers, positions, and cash flow with idempotent and audited writes.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool has a clear, distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is not an issue. The name 'vat_registry' follows a clear noun form, which is acceptable.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is on the low end for a server, but it serves a narrow, specific purpose (VAT registry check). It is borderline but not extreme given the focused functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The single tool adequately covers the intended domain: checking contractor status in the VAT taxpayer registry and validating NIP checksum. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues