Get real-time WebTorrent swarm status and active seeders to access the Magnet URI for decentralized Bible database sharing.
Retrieve real-time P2P WebTorrent Swarm status, active peer seeders, and Magnet URI for decentralized DB sharing.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v2.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. 'Retrieve' implies a read-only operation and 'real-time' indicates freshness, but the description does not disclose potential network activity, latency, or any operational caveats of accessing a P2P swarm.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, focused sentence that front-loads the core action and then lists the returned data. No filler or redundant wording.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description adequately identifies what the tool returns. It could be slightly more complete by mentioning that no input is required, but the context is simple enough that this is a minor omission.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter ambiguity to resolve. The description doesn't need to explain parameter semantics, and the baseline of 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Retrieve') with a clear resource ('P2P WebTorrent Swarm status') and lists concrete outputs (active peer seeders, Magnet URI). It is clearly distinguishable from the sibling tools, which are all Bible/scripture related.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, and no alternatives are mentioned. The intended use must be inferred from the tool name and the technical domain, which is not described.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.