Skip to main content
Glama
gregorwolf

cloud-alm-itsm-mcp

by gregorwolf

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reporterYesReporter email for API
cloud_alm_apiYesSAP Cloud ALM ITSM API endpoint
cloud_alm_token_endpointYesOAuth token endpoint for SAP Cloud ALM
cloud_alm_itsm_api_clientidYesClient ID for OAuth 2.0
cloud_alm_itsm_api_clientsecretYesClient secret for OAuth 2.0

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_installationsC

Retrieve installations from SAP Cloud ALM ITSM API with optional pagination

get_installations_by_system_typeB

Filter installations by system type (e.g., BTP, Public Cloud)

get_installations_by_customerB

Filter installations by customer number

get_installations_by_productA

Filter installations by product name

search_installationsA

Search installations by various fields (system name, customer, product, etc.)

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation2/5

All five tools are variations of retrieving installations with different filter criteria. get_installations is the base list, while by_system_type, by_customer, by_product, and search_installations overlap heavily, with search_installations effectively covering the same use cases as the others.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent get_installations_by_X pattern, but search_installations deviates by using a different verb. Aside from this one exception, the naming is predictable and readable.

Tool Count2/5

Five tools are dedicated to a single read operation (listing installations) with different filters. This is over-fragmented; a single tool with flexible filter parameters would suffice. The count feels unnecessarily high for the narrow scope.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides read/filter capabilities for installations. There are no create, update, delete, or lifecycle operations, and the server name suggests a broader ITSM scope that the tools do not cover, leaving significant gaps.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues