Skip to main content
Glama
gregorwolf

cloud-alm-itsm-mcp

by gregorwolf

Related Servers

Alternatives to cloud-alm-itsm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for monitoring and managing SAP Cloud Integration (CPI) tenants via OData APIs, supporting multi-tenant configurations and extensive tools for message logs, integration flows, deployments, and admin operations.
      46
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for AI assistants to create and manage SAP Solution Manager Focused Build Requirements and navigate the Solution Documentation process hierarchy via SAP OData API.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that bridges AI assistants to SAP Cloud ALM, exposing read APIs through four intent-based tools. It runs locally over stdio or remotely over Streamable HTTP, and can be deployed to SAP BTP Cloud Foundry.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for SAP on-premise via ADT, enabling multi-system connection, code navigation, data queries, and debugging through natural language. Includes a web admin and runtime diagnostics.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for SAP S/4HANA via the ADT API, enabling querying and reading SAP systems with production write protection.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    All five tools are variations of retrieving installations with different filter criteria. get_installations is the base list, while by_system_type, by_customer, by_product, and search_installations overlap heavily, with search_installations effectively covering the same use cases as the others.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent get_installations_by_X pattern, but search_installations deviates by using a different verb. Aside from this one exception, the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    Five tools are dedicated to a single read operation (listing installations) with different filters. This is over-fragmented; a single tool with flexible filter parameters would suffice. The count feels unnecessarily high for the narrow scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides read/filter capabilities for installations. There are no create, update, delete, or lifecycle operations, and the server name suggests a broader ITSM scope that the tools do not cover, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues