delete_module
Remove a specific module from a project using its module ID and project UUID.
Instructions
Delete a module by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | UUID of the project | |
| module_id | Yes | UUID of the module |
Remove a specific module from a project using its module ID and project UUID.
Delete a module by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | Yes | UUID of the project | |
| module_id | Yes | UUID of the module |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description only says 'delete' without disclosing irreversibility, permissions, or cascading effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence) and front-loaded, but could benefit from a tiny bit more context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation, the description is minimally adequate but lacks details on permanence and preconditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already well-documented; the description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete) and resource (module), effectively distinguishing it from siblings like archive_module and other delete tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use delete vs archive or other alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/goto-software/plane-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server