Skip to main content
Glama

Remove public link

drive_share_remove_url
Destructive

Remove a public share link from a Proton Drive file or folder to disable public access immediately. Member access remains unchanged; requires user approval.

Instructions

Remove the public share link from a file or folder; it stops working immediately. Member access is unaffected. Requires confirmed=true after explicit user approval.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesAbsolute remote Drive path whose public link should be removed (must start with '/').
confirmedNoMust be true; only after the user approved this exact action.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.2.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / confirmed / description
      Previous value: -"Must be true. Only set after the user explicitly approved this exact action."New value: +"Must be true; only after the user approved this exact action."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.38
    • addedInput schema / properties / confirmed
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Must be true. Only set after the user explicitly approved this exact action.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Addedv1.0.28

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructiveHint=true, and the description adds meaningful context beyond that: the link stops working immediately and member access remains intact, plus the confirmation gate. It doesn't note irreversibility details or whether the link can be recreated, but the added behavioral detail is solid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short clauses, front-loaded with the action and effect, then the safety gate. No filler sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A simple two-parameter mutation with no output schema; the description covers effect, scope, and the confirmation requirement, which is everything an agent needs to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both 'path' and 'confirmed' are already documented in the schema. The description reinforces the confirmed=true requirement but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Remove the public share link from a file or folder') and scopes it precisely enough to distinguish it from siblings like drive_share_remove_all and drive_share_set_url.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear precondition ('Requires confirmed=true after explicit user approval') and clarifies the blast radius ('Member access is unaffected'), which tells the agent this targets only the public link. It does not explicitly name an alternative tool for bulk removal, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.