Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codesafer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that inspects AI-generated code and returns a deterministic list of structural and safety violations, so an AI coding agent can fix its own output before the code lands.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security MCP server with 300+ rules for AI-generated code. Scans Next.js, Supabase, Clerk, Stripe, Prisma, Hono, GraphQL and 20+ modules. Zero config, runs locally.
      39
      2,352 npm
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Security scanner and MCP server that catches dangerous patterns in MCP servers and AI agent projects, such as leaked secrets, shell execution, and prompt-injection text. Runs as both a CLI and MCP server with CI-friendly severity gates.
      2
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP security server for AI coding agents. 12 tools: pre-install guardian, vulnerability audit, supply-chain attack detection via static code analysis, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation. Zero runtime dependencies.
      14
      41 npm
      16
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: scan_file vs scan_directory differ by scope, ai_analyze uses ML, check_dependencies focuses on dependencies, and scan_rules_file is for configuration files. No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools mostly follow verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., scan_file, check_dependencies). The outlier is ai_analyze, which uses a prefix instead of a verb-noun structure, but it's still clear and consistent overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools covering scanning, AI analysis, dependency checks, and explanations, the count is well-scoped for a focused security analysis server. Not too many or too few.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core scanning and analysis tasks well, including file/directory scanning, dependency risks, AI-based analysis, and explanations. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for aggregated reporting or finding management, but the surface is largely complete for detection and explanation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues