Skip to main content
Glama
globus

globus-mcp

Official
by globus
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to globus-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rucio-mcp

      kratsg
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Rucio distributed data management operations as tools for LLMs. Designed for ATLAS physicists working with grid data on analysis facilities, but usable with any Rucio instance.
      6
      Apache 2.0

    • quads-mcp

      grafuls
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with QUADS infrastructure systems via API, enabling resource management and automation through LLM applications.
      MIT

    • jlab-mcp

      kdkyum
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to execute Python code on GPU-accelerated compute nodes within SLURM-managed HPC environments. It bridges local clients to remote clusters by launching JupyterLab sessions via SLURM jobs to facilitate high-performance notebook-based computation.
      7
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The tools are cleanly separated into two distinct domains (Globus Compute and Globus Transfer), with no overlap in functionality. Each tool has a unique and clear purpose, aided by detailed descriptions that specify when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent pattern: globus_{domain}_{verb}_{noun} in snake_case. This makes it predictable and easy for an agent to infer functionality from the name.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools covering the key operations for both Compute and Transfer services, the count is well-scoped. Each tool addresses a distinct need without unnecessary duplication, and the set feels complete for typical workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the essential operations for both services: registration, listing, submission, and status retrieval for Compute; listing, searching, directory browsing, submission, and event monitoring for Transfer. Minor omissions like delete or cancel are present but don't significantly hinder core usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources