Skip to main content
Glama
global-mysterysnailrevolution

simple-rail-mcp

Simple Rail MCP Server

MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for controlling linear rails via natural language through Claude AI in Cursor.

What This Does

Control your linear rail with natural language:

You: "Move the rail to position 500mm"
Claude: ✅ Rail moved to 500mm

You: "Move rail to opentrons station"
Claude: ✅ Rail at opentrons station

Related MCP server: Railway MCP Server

Supported Controllers

  • UW PICO 5.09 - HTTP API with G-code forwarding (pre-configured)

  • ✅ Any HTTP API that accepts commands

  • ✅ Serial port controllers

  • ✅ Python script wrappers

  • ✅ G-code senders

Quick Start

1. Install

npm install

2. Configure

Edit index.js lines 32-37:

// For UW PICO controller:
this.RAIL_IP = "192.168.1.101";      // Your controller IP
this.RAIL_PORT = "80";
this.RAIL_ENDPOINT = "/command";
this.COMMAND_TEMPLATE = "G0 X{position} F1000";

Set your positions (lines 41-47):

this.POSITIONS = {
  "pickup_station": 0,
  "opentrons": 500,
  "plate_reader": 750,
  "storage": 1000,
  "home": 0
};

3. Add to Cursor

Edit .cursor/mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rail": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/simple-rail-mcp/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "RAIL_IP": "192.168.1.101"
      }
    }
  }
}

4. Restart Cursor

5. Use!

"Move the rail to opentrons"
"Move rail to 500mm"
"Move to home position"

Configuration Options

For UW PICO 5.09 Controller

Your controller has an HTTP API that forwards G-code via UART.

Test with curl:

curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command \
  -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
  -d "cmd=G0 X500 F1000"

Config:

this.RAIL_IP = "192.168.1.101";
this.RAIL_PORT = "80";
this.RAIL_ENDPOINT = "/command";
this.COMMAND_TEMPLATE = "G0 X{position} F1000";

For Other HTTP APIs

If your controller uses different endpoints/formats:

this.RAIL_IP = "192.168.1.100";
this.RAIL_ENDPOINT = "/api/move";
this.COMMAND_TEMPLATE = '{"position": {position}}';  // JSON format

Position Configuration

Edit the POSITIONS object to match your physical setup:

this.POSITIONS = {
  "station_a": 0,        // First position (mm)
  "station_b": 250,      // Second position (mm)
  "station_c": 500,      // Third position (mm)
  "home": 0              // Home position
};

Timing Configuration

Adjust wait time after movement (line 54):

this.MOVE_WAIT_TIME = 5;  // Wait 5 seconds after sending command

If your rail is faster or slower, adjust accordingly.

Environment Variables

You can override config with environment variables:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rail": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "RAIL_IP": "192.168.1.101",
        "RAIL_PORT": "80"
      }
    }
  }
}

API Reference

Tool: move_rail_and_wait

Move linear rail to a position and wait for completion.

Parameters:

  • position (string) - Named position from POSITIONS config

    • Example: "opentrons", "pickup_station", "home"

  • position_number (number) - Numeric position in mm

    • Example: 500, 750.5

  • wait_seconds (number) - Override default wait time

    • Default: MOVE_WAIT_TIME from config

Examples:

// Via Claude in natural language:
"Move rail to opentrons"
"Move rail to 500mm"
"Move to home position"

// Direct tool call (from code):
move_rail_and_wait({ position: "opentrons" })
move_rail_and_wait({ position_number: 500 })
move_rail_and_wait({ position: "storage", wait_seconds: 10 })

G-code Reference

Common G-code commands for linear rails:

Command

Description

G0 X500 F1000

Move to 500mm at 1000mm/min (fast)

G1 X500 F500

Move to 500mm at 500mm/min (controlled)

G28 X

Home X axis

G90

Set absolute positioning mode

G91

Set relative positioning mode

G92 X0

Set current position as zero

M114

Query current position

M400

Wait for all moves to complete

Troubleshooting

Cannot connect to controller

  1. Check IP:

    ping 192.168.1.101
  2. Test endpoint:

    curl http://192.168.1.101/command
  3. Check firewall - Allow Node.js/Cursor through firewall

Rail doesn't move

  1. Test G-code manually:

    curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command -d "cmd=G28 X"  # Home first
    curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command -d "cmd=G0 X500 F1000"
  2. Check positioning mode:

    curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command -d "cmd=G90"  # Absolute mode
  3. Verify position is in range - Check your rail's physical limits

Wrong position

  1. Check units - Make sure G21 (mm) is set:

    curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command -d "cmd=G21"
  2. Calibrate positions - Measure actual distances and update POSITIONS

  3. Home the rail first:

    curl -X POST http://192.168.1.101/command -d "cmd=G28 X"

MCP server not loading in Cursor

  1. Test manually:

    node index.js
  2. Check Node version:

    node --version  # Should be ≥18.0.0
  3. Check path in .cursor/mcp.json - Use absolute path

  4. Restart Cursor completely

Advanced: Custom Controller Support

To add support for other controller types, modify the sendHttpCommand method:

async sendHttpCommand(position) {
  const gcode = this.COMMAND_TEMPLATE.replace('{position}', position);
  const url = `http://${this.RAIL_IP}:${this.RAIL_PORT}${this.RAIL_ENDPOINT}`;
  
  // Customize request format here
  const response = await fetch(url, {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: {
      'Content-Type': 'application/json'  // Change as needed
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({ command: gcode })  // Change format
  });
  
  // Customize response parsing here
  const data = await response.json();
  return data;
}

Integration Example

Use with other MCP servers for full automation:

// Example: Pick up plate and move to Opentrons
"Move rail to pickup station"  // This MCP server
"Run VLA pickup script"        // VLA MCP server
"Move rail to opentrons"       // This MCP server
"Upload purple_mixing.py"      // Opentrons MCP server
"Start the protocol"           // Opentrons MCP server

Claude AI automatically orchestrates all systems!

Requirements

  • Node.js ≥18.0.0

  • Cursor IDE with MCP support

  • Linear rail with HTTP/serial/script control

License

MIT

Contributing

Issues and pull requests welcome!

Credits

  • Model Context Protocol - Anthropic

  • Claude AI - Natural language orchestration

  • Cursor IDE - Development environment


Questions? Open an issue or check the troubleshooting guide.

Available Tools

1 tool
move_rail_and_waitB

Move linear rail to a position and wait for completion. Simple command-based control.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
positionNoNamed position to move to
wait_secondsNoSeconds to wait after move command
position_numberNoOr specify numeric position (mm)

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It does disclose that the tool blocks until motion is complete, which is useful behavioral context. But it omits whether the move is absolute or relative, what happens on failure or timeout, whether the position becomes occupied, and how the wait_seconds interacts with actual completion.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no wasted words and the action is front-loaded. It is appropriately sized, though the phrase 'Simple command-based control' is somewhat redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a motion-control tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should at minimum address safety implications of moving hardware, error behavior, and interaction between wait_seconds and the natural completion wait. These are absent, leaving significant operational gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents each parameter and its enum values. The description adds no syntax, units, or behavioral nuance beyond what is in the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb (move) and resource (linear rail), and adds behavioral detail (waits for completion) that distinguishes this from a fire-and-forget move command. However, with no siblings to differentiate against and no mention of the rail's role in the broader system, it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus an alternative that might not wait, nor does it explain prerequisites such as whether the rail must be homed first. 'Simple command-based control' is too vague to function as usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev1.0.0
    • First observedmove_rail_and_wait

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool in the set. Its purpose is clearly stated as moving a linear rail and waiting for completion.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, there is no inconsistency across names. The name move_rail_and_wait follows a readable snake_case verb_noun pattern and is descriptive.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool is borderline thin for a server, even one described as simple. If the intended scope is only command-based movement, it may suffice, but typical rail control often needs more operations.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface covers only moving and waiting, leaving significant gaps for a rail-control domain. Missing operations such as stop, home, get position, or set speed could cause agent failures in common workflows.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers