Confluence MCP Server
The Confluence MCP Server integrates Atlassian Confluence with Claude Code, enabling you to manage Confluence content through the following operations:
Search Content: Search across Confluence using CQL (Confluence Query Language), with optional space filtering and result limits.
List Spaces: Retrieve all Confluence spaces accessible to your account.
Get Page by ID: Fetch a specific page's full content, version info, and metadata.
Get Page by Title: Look up a page by its exact title within a specific space.
Get Space Info: Retrieve metadata and configuration details for a specific space.
Create Pages: Create new pages in a specified space using HTML content, optionally nested under a parent page.
Update Pages: Modify existing pages by providing updated title, HTML content, and the current version number.
Add Labels: Tag pages with one or more labels for organization and categorization.
List Attachments: List all file attachments associated with a specific page.
Download Attachments: Download attachments from a page using their attachment ID.
Integrates with Atlassian Confluence via the Confluence REST API, enabling tools to search, read, create, update pages, manage labels, list spaces, and attachments.
Provides tools for searching Confluence content using CQL, reading pages by ID or title, creating and updating pages, managing labels, and listing spaces and attachments via the Confluence REST API.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Confluence MCP Serverfind pages about API documentation"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Confluence MCP Server
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Atlassian Confluence integration with Claude Code.
Features
š Search across Confluence pages using CQL (Confluence Query Language)
š Read pages by ID or title
āļø Create and update pages
š·ļø Manage labels and metadata
š List spaces and attachments
š Secure Basic Auth with API tokens
Related MCP server: mcp-confluence
Installation
Prerequisites
Node.js 18+ and npm
Atlassian Confluence Cloud account
API token (see Configuration below)
Setup
git clone https://github.com/gkrauchunas-arlo/confluence-mcp.git
cd confluence-mcp
npm installConfiguration
Copy
.env.exampleto.env:cp .env.example .envFill in your Atlassian credentials in
.env:ATLASSIAN_SITE=your-domain.atlassian.net ATLASSIAN_EMAIL=your-email@example.com ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN=your-token
Getting an API token:
Go to https://id.atlassian.com/manage-profile/security/api-tokens
Click "Create API token"
Give it a name (e.g., "Claude Code MCP") and copy the token to
.env
Testing
# Test Confluence API connectivity
node test-confluence.js
# Test MCP protocol (via stdio)
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"0.1.0","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"test","version":"1.0.0"}}}' | node index.jsConnecting to Claude Code
Mode 1: stdio (Desktop/Web)
stdio mode works in Claude Code Desktop and Web versions.
Quick Install (Recommended)
cd confluence-mcp
npm run install:userThis will install the MCP server in user scope - available in all your Claude Code sessions!
Option 2: Manual CLI Installation
claude mcp add confluence --scope user \
--env ATLASSIAN_SITE="your-domain.atlassian.net" \
--env ATLASSIAN_EMAIL="your-email@example.com" \
--env ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN="your-token" \
-- node /absolute/path/to/confluence-mcp/index.jsReplace /absolute/path/to/ with your actual installation path (e.g., /home/username/confluence-mcp).
Configuration File
Add to your Claude Code MCP configuration file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"confluence": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/confluence-mcp/index.js"],
"env": {
"ATLASSIAN_SITE": "your-domain.atlassian.net",
"ATLASSIAN_EMAIL": "your-email@example.com",
"ATLASSIAN_API_TOKEN": "your-token"
}
}
}
}Configuration file locations:
Linux:
~/.config/claude-code/mcp_servers.jsonor~/.claude/.mcp.jsonmacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/claude-code/mcp_servers.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\claude-code\mcp_servers.json
After configuration, the MCP server is immediately available in all Claude Code sessions!
Mode 2: HTTP (CLI)
HTTP mode is required for Claude Code CLI, as it doesn't support stdio MCP servers.
Step 1: Start HTTP server
cd confluence-mcp
npm run start:httpOr in background:
cd confluence-mcp
node http-server.js &Server will run on http://localhost:3456 by default. Use PORT environment variable to change.
Step 2: Configure MCP
Add to ~/.claude/.mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"confluence": {
"type": "http",
"url": "http://localhost:3456/mcp"
}
}
}Step 3: Restart Claude Code
exit
claudeHealth Check
curl http://localhost:3456/healthShould return:
{
"status": "ok",
"service": "confluence-mcp-http"
}Check Status
npm run status
# or
claude mcp listQuick Reference
See CHEATSHEET.md for quick command examples and QUICKSTART.md for detailed usage guide.
Available Tools
Search & Navigation
confluence_search- CQL search across all contentParameters:
query(string),limit(number, optional),spaceKey(string, optional)Example: Search for pages with "API" in title within a specific space
confluence_list_spaces- List all spacesParameters:
limit(number, optional, default: 25)Returns: List of all Confluence spaces accessible to your account
Read Content
confluence_get_page- Get page by IDParameters:
pageId(string)Returns: Complete page data including content, version, metadata, and attachments with download URLs
confluence_get_page_by_title- Find page by title and spaceParameters:
title(string),spaceKey(string)Returns: Page matching the exact title in the specified space, including attachments
confluence_get_space- Get space informationParameters:
spaceKey(string)Returns: Space metadata and configuration
confluence_get_attachments- List page attachmentsParameters:
pageId(string)Returns: List of all attachments on a page
Create & Edit
confluence_create_page- Create a new pageParameters:
title(string),spaceKey(string),content(HTML string),parentId(string, optional)Creates a new page in the specified space, optionally as a child of another page
confluence_update_page- Update existing pageParameters:
pageId(string),title(string),content(HTML string),version(number)Updates a page with new content. Version number must match the current page version.
Metadata
confluence_add_labels- Add labels to a pageParameters:
pageId(string),labels(array of strings)Adds one or more labels/tags to a page for categorization
Working with Attachments
Pages retrieved via confluence_get_page and confluence_get_page_by_title automatically include attachment information. Each attachment contains:
id: Attachment ID (e.g.,
att1322876959) - used for downloadingtitle: Filename
mediaType: MIME type (e.g.,
image/png,application/pdf)fileSize: Size in bytes
Example attachment structure:
{
"children": {
"attachment": {
"results": [
{
"id": "att1322876959",
"title": "diagram.png",
"extensions": {
"mediaType": "image/png",
"fileSize": 348053
}
}
]
}
}
}Downloading Attachments
Use the confluence_download_attachment tool with the attachment ID:
// Get page with attachments
const page = await confluence_get_page({ pageId: "1320288861" });
// Find the attachment you need
const attachment = page.children.attachment.results.find(a => a.title === "diagram.drawio");
// Download it
const content = await confluence_download_attachment({
pageId: "1320288861",
attachmentId: attachment.id // e.g., "att1322876959"
});The download uses the REST API v1 endpoint (/wiki/rest/api/content/{pageId}/child/attachment/{attachmentId}/download) which supports API token authentication, unlike the browser-only download URLs.
Usage Examples
Once connected to Claude Code, you can use natural language to interact with Confluence:
Search for pages
Find all pages about "API documentation" in ConfluenceRead a page
Read the contents of Confluence page with ID 12345Create a new page
Create a new page in the DEV space titled "API Guidelines" with this content:
<h1>API Guidelines</h1>
<p>This document describes our API design principles.</p>Update a page
Update Confluence page 12345 to add a new section about authenticationAdd labels
Add labels "documentation" and "api" to Confluence page 12345View page with diagrams
Read page 1320288861 and show me all attached diagramsThe response will include download URLs for all images and diagrams attached to the page.
CQL Query Examples
The confluence_search tool supports Confluence Query Language (CQL):
type=page AND title~"API"
type=page AND space=DEV
type=page ORDER BY lastmodified DESC
type=page AND label=documentation
type=page AND creator=currentUser()API Reference
This MCP server uses the Confluence REST API:
Base URL:
https://{site}.atlassian.net/wiki/rest/apiAuthentication: Basic Auth with email + API token
API Version: Cloud REST API (stable)
Troubleshooting
"Authentication failed"
Verify your email and API token in
.envEnsure the token hasn't expired (API tokens don't expire but can be revoked)
Check you're using an API token, not your Atlassian account password
"MCP tools not showing up"
Restart Claude Code completely (close and reopen)
Check server logs for errors by running
node index.jsdirectlyVerify configuration with
claude mcp listEnsure the full absolute path is used in the configuration
"Permission denied" errors
Ensure your Atlassian account has access to the requested spaces/pages
Some operations require specific permissions (e.g., space admin for creating pages)
Check space permissions in Confluence web UI
"Page version conflict"
When updating a page, you must provide the current version number
Get the current version with
confluence_get_pagefirstThe server will automatically increment the version by 1
Content Format
Confluence pages use Storage Format (HTML with Confluence macros). For simple pages, standard HTML works:
<h1>Heading</h1>
<p>Paragraph with <strong>bold</strong> and <em>italic</em> text.</p>
<ul>
<li>Bullet point 1</li>
<li>Bullet point 2</li>
</ul>
<pre><code>Code block</code></pre>For advanced features, see Confluence Storage Format documentation.
Architecture
Built on:
@modelcontextprotocol/sdk - MCP protocol implementation
axios - HTTP client for Confluence REST API
dotenv - Configuration management
The server runs as a stdio-based MCP server, communicating with Claude Code via JSON-RPC 2.0 over standard input/output.
Development
Project Structure
confluence-mcp/
āāā index.js # Main MCP server implementation
āāā package.json # Dependencies and scripts
āāā test-confluence.js # Confluence API connectivity tests
āāā test-mcp.js # MCP protocol tests (WIP)
āāā .env.example # Example configuration
āāā .env # Your configuration (gitignored)
āāā README.md # This fileRunning Tests
# Test Confluence API directly
node test-confluence.js
# Test MCP server via stdio
echo '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"0.1.0","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"test","version":"1.0.0"}}}' | node index.jsContributing
Contributions welcome! Please:
Fork the repository
Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature)Make your changes with tests
Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'feat: add amazing feature')Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature)Open a Pull Request
Known Limitations
Attachment uploads - Not yet implemented (requires multipart/form-data encoding)
Rich text formatting - Only basic HTML supported, Confluence macros can be complex
Pagination - Large result sets are limited by the
limitparameterPermissions - API returns only content accessible to the authenticated user
License
ISC
Acknowledgments
Architecture inspired by rovo-mcp
Built for Claude Code
Uses the Model Context Protocol
Support
Issues: https://github.com/gkrauchunas-arlo/confluence-mcp/issues
Atlassian API Docs: https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/confluence/rest/
MCP Specification: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification
Created by: gkrauchunas-arlo
Status: Stable v1.0.0 - All core features implemented and tested
Available Tools
9 toolsconfluence_add_labelsB
Add labels (tags) to a Confluence page
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The ID of the page | |
| labels | Yes | Array of label names to add |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. Only states 'add labels' without clarifying whether labels are appended or replaced, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise, but lacks structure and front-loading of critical details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with two straightforward parameters. Missing details on return value or success indication, but adequate for basic understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with basic descriptions. Tool description adds no additional meaning beyond schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb ('Add labels') and resource ('Confluence page'), distinct from sibling tools which focus on page creation, retrieval, and search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, limitations, or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_create_pageB
Create a new Confluence page in a specific space
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | The title of the new page | |
| spaceKey | Yes | The key of the space where the page will be created | |
| content | Yes | The page content in Confluence storage format (HTML) | |
| parentId | No | Optional ID of the parent page (creates a child page) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must carry the burden. It only says 'Create', implying mutation, but does not disclose permissions, side effects, or return values.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise, one sentence with clear purpose. Front-loaded but could be slightly more descriptive without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, but description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., page ID). Missing context about behavior after creation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides for parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Create', the resource 'a new Confluence page', and the scope 'in a specific space', which distinguishes it from siblings like update_page or get_page.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use or when not to use this tool. Does not mention alternatives or prerequisites, such as needing an existing space or parent page.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_get_attachmentsB
Get list of attachments for a Confluence page
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The ID of the page |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description is minimal and does not disclose behavioral traits like pagination, limits, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no waste, but could include more detail without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations; description does not explain return value structure or pagination, leaving gaps for a list operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with pageId described; tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Get list' and resource 'attachments for a Confluence page', distinguishing it from siblings like confluence_add_labels or confluence_create_page.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; lacks context about prerequisites or constraints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_get_pageA
Get a Confluence page by ID including its content, version, and metadata
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The ID of the page to retrieve |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It indicates a read operation but omits behavioral details such as required permissions, whether the operation is destructive, rate limits, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the key action and resource. No extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, description usefully lists returned fields (content, version, metadata). However, it lacks details on response structure, potential errors, or pagination behavior. For a simple get by ID, it is mostly adequate but could be more comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'pageId', which already has a clear description. The tool description adds no additional semantic value beyond what is in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'get', resource 'Confluence page by ID', and lists returned fields 'content, version, and metadata'. Distinguishes from sibling 'confluence_get_page_by_title' which retrieves by title.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies use when page ID is known, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like 'confluence_get_page_by_title' or provide context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_get_page_by_titleB
Find a Confluence page by its title and space key
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | The exact title of the page | |
| spaceKey | Yes | The key of the space containing the page |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'find', but does not disclose behavior on missing pages, return format (content vs metadata), or side effects. Highly insufficient for a retrieval tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single short sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no output schema and 2 required params. Description does not specify what is returned (e.g., page content, metadata) or behavior on not found. Missing critical return value information for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema descriptions already cover both parameters (title and spaceKey) with clear explanations. Description adds no extra meaning, but schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (find), resource (Confluence page), and identifiers (title and space key). It distinguishes from siblings like 'confluence_get_page' which likely uses page ID, and 'confluence_search' which is broader.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'confluence_get_page' (by ID) or 'confluence_search'. No explicit context or exclusion criteria provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_get_spaceB
Get information about a specific Confluence space
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| spaceKey | Yes | The key of the space to retrieve |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only says 'Get information', failing to disclose behavioral traits like return format, authentication requirements, rate limits, or potential errors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that efficiently states the purpose. It is not verbose, but could include more detail without being wasteful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema and no annotations, yet the description provides no hint about return values, pagination, or related data. This under-specifies the behavior for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter 'spaceKey' with a description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get information about a specific Confluence space', which uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like 'list_spaces' (list vs. get specific) and 'get_page' (different resource).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied: use when needing info on a specific space. There is no explicit guidance on when to use this vs. alternatives (e.g., 'list_spaces' for all spaces) or prerequisites, which leaves some ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_list_spacesA
List all Confluence spaces accessible to the user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Maximum number of spaces to return (default: 25) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It mentions 'accessible to the user' implying personalization, but lacks details on pagination, rate limits, or edge cases.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no redundant words. Perfectly concise for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. Could mention pagination or return format but not necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with limit parameter already described. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list) and resource (spaces), and distinguishes from sibling tools like get_space (specific) and search (content).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No mention of when not to use or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_searchA
Search Confluence content using CQL (Confluence Query Language). Example queries: "type=page AND title~"API"", "type=page ORDER BY lastmodified DESC"
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | CQL search query (e.g., "type=page AND title~\"keyword\"") | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of results (default: 10) | |
| spaceKey | No | Optional space key to limit search to a specific space |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, pagination, rate limits, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with clear purpose and example queries; no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and simple tool, the description covers the basic purpose and usage, but lacks behavioral context and return details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the example queries add value for the query parameter, though no additional info is given for limit or spaceKey.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool searches Confluence content using CQL, with specific examples distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_page or get_page.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies the tool is for searching, but does not explicitly provide when-to-use or when-not-to-use scenarios, nor mention alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
confluence_update_pageC
Update an existing Confluence page
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The ID of the page to update | |
| title | Yes | The new title for the page | |
| content | Yes | The new content in Confluence storage format (HTML) | |
| version | Yes | Current version number of the page (will be incremented) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should detail behavioral traits like destructive overwrite, version incrementing, and content format. It only says 'update', omitting key details that are only in the schema (e.g., version requirement, storage format).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise, but lacks structure. It does not front-load critical information like required parameters or behavioral notes, making it minimally adequate.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given four required parameters and no output schema, the description fails to explain versioning implications, content format, or error handling. It is incomplete for an AI agent to use correctly without additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so it neither improves nor harms parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'update' and resource 'existing Confluence page', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like create_page, get_page, etc. However, it does not specify which fields can be updated, which is partially covered by schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites mentioned, and no context about required version handling or page existence. The description solely states the action without any decision-making support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
9 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
confluence_add_labels - First observed
confluence_create_page - First observed
confluence_get_attachments - First observed
confluence_get_page - First observed
confluence_get_page_by_title - First observed
confluence_get_space - First observed
confluence_list_spaces - First observed
confluence_search - First observed
confluence_update_page
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action. There is no overlap between getting a page by ID vs title, or between getting a space and listing spaces. All tools have clearly separate purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent 'confluence_verb_noun' pattern, using snake_case. Verbs like add, create, get, list, search, and update are applied uniformly, making the set predictable.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Confluence MCP server. It covers essential CRUD operations for pages, spaces, attachments, labels, and search without being overly large or sparse.
Core workflows are covered: page create/read/update, space retrieval, search, and attachments. Minor gaps like delete operations and label management are absent, but the surface is sufficient for typical use.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server unifying ERPs, CRMs, APIs and knowledge base for Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini.
Augments MCP Server - A comprehensive framework documentation provider for Claude Code
An MCP server that provides an API to LLMs to manage their JumpCloud resources.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Confluence Cloud/Server/Data Center, enabling page search, CQL queries, page CRUD, attachment upload, and user identity lookup.232444MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for searching and retrieving pages from Atlassian Confluence.311MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Confluence Server/Data Center (self-hosted) that gives LLM agents access to search, read, create/edit pages, comments, labels, and attachments via the Confluence REST API.1531ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for integrating Confluence with AI applications, enabling listing spaces, browsing and searching pages, and retrieving Confluence instance info.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gkrauchunas-arlo/confluence-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server