Backlog MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Backlog MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceManages TODO tasks with operations like add, list, complete, update, and delete, stored in a JSON file.-
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables task management via MCP tools for creating, listing, updating, completing, and deleting tasks with JSON file storage.6-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to manage tasks through a simple JSON file interface. Provides basic task management functionality by reading and writing to a configurable tasks.json file.10 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables task management through natural language with full CRUD operations including add, list, update, complete, and delete tasks with JSON persistence.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables to manage tasks stored locally in a JSON file, including adding, completing, and querying pending tasks, as well as generating daily summaries.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight task management MCP server that enables CRUD operations on tasks stored in a single JSON file, including listing, creating, updating progress, and setting priorities.137 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Some tools are clearly distinct (backlog_get, backlog_delete, backlog_search), but overlap exists among 'capture' tools (backlog_capture_prompt, backlog_capture_reference, backlog_capture_requirement) and 'create' tools (backlog_create_work, backlog_organize_folder, backlog_schedule_cron) that may confuse selection. Also, backlog_wakeup and backlog_recall both serve retrieval purposes, but their contexts differ; the descriptions do help to differentiate these.
All tool names are lowercase with underscores, but the verb style varies: some use verb_noun (backlog_get, backlog_delete), others use verb_object (backlog_complete_task, backlog_attach_artifact), and some lack a clear verb-object structure (backlog_consolidation_candidates, backlog_contradictions). The consistent prefix 'backlog_' helps, but patterns like 'create' vs 'capture' and 'organize' are not uniform.
23 tools is a fairly large set, but it covers the domain of a project management/knowledge memory server well. Each tool serves a distinct function — CRUD for work items, ADR management, memory operations, scheduling, and organization. Slightly heavy, but justified given the breadth of features (tasks, ADRs, memories, scheduling).
The tool surface is extensive, covering work item lifecycle (create, get, delete, complete, block), ADR handling (accept, supersede), memory management (remember, recall, forget, consolidation), and project organization (folders, attachments, requirements). Minor gaps include no explicit 'update_work' or 'unblock_task', but these may be handled via write_resource or other mechanisms.