Skip to main content
Glama

list_pending_transactions

View all pending chain-write transactions awaiting confirmation in the current session. Each entry provides pending ID, tool, detail, wallet, and expiry to help decide whether to confirm or reject.

Instructions

Use this to see all pending chain-write transactions awaiting confirmation in the current session. Returns pending_id, tool, detail, wallet, and expiry for each. See also: confirm_transaction, reject_transaction.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it returns pending transactions and lists the fields. No annotations, so the description carries the burden; it adequately conveys read-only behavior and what the agent can expect.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Purpose and return fields front-loaded. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, return fields, and links to related actions. No output schema needed; description fully informs the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter details but is not required. Baseline 4 for zero-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States clearly it lists pending chain-write transactions awaiting confirmation. The verb 'list' and noun 'pending transactions' are precise, and it naturally distinguishes from sibling tools like confirm_transaction and reject_transaction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use this to see...' and provides related tools. It lacks explicit when-not usage, but the context is clear given it's a simple list operation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gitopia/gitopia-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server