Skip to main content
Glama

create_release

Create an on-chain release for a tagged version. Provide owner, repo name, tag, and release title to sign and broadcast a transaction, receiving a release ID. Supports draft, pre-release, and custom target.

Instructions

Use this when you want to publish a release for a tagged version. The tag must already exist on the remote (push it via git first). Signs and broadcasts an on-chain transaction. Returns the release ID. Requires 'owner', 'name', 'tag_name', and 'release_name'. Optional: 'target' (branch, defaults to the repo's default branch), 'description', 'draft', 'pre_release', 'provider'. See also: list_releases, list_tags.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ownerYesRepository owner (username or DAO name)
nameYesRepository name
tag_nameYesTag name for the release (e.g. v1.0.0)
targetNoBranch or commit SHA to tag (defaults to default branch HEAD)
release_nameYesHuman-readable release title
descriptionNoRelease notes / description
draftNoMark as draft release
pre_releaseNoMark as pre-release
providerNoGit server provider address (defaults to gitopia15nv5vf6fmww8cxr6emrzxjvj36x5n8xvsxsqpw)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that the tool 'Signs and broadcasts an on-chain transaction' and 'Returns the release ID'. No annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden; it is mostly adequate but could mention permissions or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (three sentences), front-loaded with the main purpose, and no superfluous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers prerequisites, required and optional parameters, return value, and related tools. Missing details on potential errors or transaction cost, but reasonable given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema coverage, the description adds value by noting defaults for 'target' (defaults to default branch) and 'provider' (default address), enhancing understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'publish a release for a tagged version' with a specific verb and resource. It also distinguishes from sibling tools like list_releases and list_tags.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states prerequisite ('tag must already exist on the remote') and required parameters. Provides alternatives by mentioning 'See also: list_releases, list_tags'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gitopia/gitopia-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server