en es ja ko zh

AWS Cognito MCP Server

Name: AWS Cognito MCP Server
Author: gitCarrot

by gitCarrot

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

JavaScript

Remote

Servidor MCP de AWS Cognito

Una implementación de servidor del Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) que se conecta a AWS Cognito para la autenticación y la gestión de usuarios. Este servidor proporciona un conjunto de herramientas para los flujos de autenticación de usuarios, incluyendo el registro, el inicio de sesión, la gestión de contraseñas y más.

Prerrequisitos

Cuenta de AWS con el grupo de usuarios de Cognito configurado
Node.js 18 o superior

Related MCP server: Remote MCP Server with GitHub OAuth

Instalación

# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/mcp-server-aws-cognito.git

# Install dependencies
cd mcp-server-aws-cognito
npm install

# Build the server
npm run build

Configuración de AWS Cognito

Inicie sesión en su consola de AWS y navegue hasta Amazon Cognito
Cree un grupo de usuarios o utilice uno existente
Anote el ID del grupo de usuarios y el ID del cliente de la aplicación
Establezca estos valores como variables de entorno o en un archivo .env (solo necesita el archivo .env cuando usa Claude Code, no Claude Desktop):

AWS_COGNITO_USER_POOL_ID=your-user-pool-id
AWS_COGNITO_USER_POOL_CLIENT_ID=your-app-client-id

Herramientas disponibles

Nombre de la herramienta	Descripción	Parámetros
`sign_up`	Registrar un nuevo usuario	`email` : cadena, `password` : cadena
`sign_up_confirm_code_from_email`	Verificar cuenta con código de confirmación	`username` : cadena, `confirmationCode` : cadena
`sign_in`	Autenticar un usuario	`username` : cadena, `password` : cadena
`sign_out`	Cerrar la sesión del usuario actual	Ninguno
`getCurrentUser`	Obtener el usuario que ha iniciado sesión actualmente	Ninguno
`reset_password_send_code`	Solicitar código de restablecimiento de contraseña	`username` : cadena
`reset_password_veryify_code`	Restablecer contraseña con código de verificación	`username` : cadena, `code` : cadena, `newPassword` : cadena
`change_password`	Cambiar la contraseña del usuario que inició sesión	`oldPassword` : cadena, `newPassword` : cadena
`refresh_session`	Actualizar los tokens de autenticación	Ninguno
`update_user_attributes`	Actualizar los atributos del perfil de usuario	`attributes` : Matriz de `{name: string, value: string}`
`delete_user`	Eliminar el usuario que ha iniciado sesión actualmente	Ninguno
`resend_confirmation_code`	Reenviar el código de verificación de la cuenta	`username` : cadena
`verify_software_token`	Verificar TOTP para MFA	`username` : cadena, `totpCode` : cadena

El Inspector proporcionará una URL para acceder a las herramientas de depuración en su navegador.

Uso con Claude Desktop

Antes de comenzar, asegúrese de que Node.js esté instalado en su escritorio para que npx funcione.

Vaya a: Configuración > Desarrollador > Editar configuración
Agregue lo siguiente a su claude_desktop_config.json :

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aws-cognito-mcp-server": {
      "command": "/path/to/mcp-server-aws-cognito/build/index.js",
      "env": {
        "AWS_COGNITO_USER_POOL_ID": "your-user-pool-id",
        "AWS_COGNITO_USER_POOL_CLIENT_ID": "your-app-client-id"
      }
    }
  }
}

Uso con Claude Code

Claude Code es una interfaz de línea de comandos para Claude. Para usar este servidor MCP con Claude Code:

Instale Claude Code siguiendo las instrucciones en la Documentación de Claude Code
Agregue el servidor MCP a Claude Code:

claude mcp add "aws-cognito-mcp" npx tsx index.ts

Verifique que se haya agregado:

claude mcp list

Ejecute Claude con su servidor MCP:

claude

Desarrollo

Para desarrollo con reconstrucción automática:

npm run watch

Depuración

Dado que los servidores MCP se comunican a través de stdio, la depuración puede ser complicada. Utilice el Inspector MCP para una mejor visibilidad:

npm run inspector

¡Ahora puedes usar las herramientas de autenticación de AWS Cognito con Claude!

Available Tools

13 tools

change_passwordD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`oldPassword`	Yes
`newPassword`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

confirm_code_from_email_for_signUpD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes
`confirmationCode`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

delete_userD

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

getCurrentUserD

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

refresh_sessionD

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

resend_confirmation_codeD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

reset_password_send_codeD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

reset_password_veryify_codeD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes
`code`	Yes
`newPassword`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sign_inD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes
`password`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sign_outD

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

sign_upD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`password`	Yes
`email`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

update_user_attributesD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`attributes`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

verify_software_tokenD

Name	Required	Description	Default
`username`	Yes
`totpCode`	Yes

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

13 tool updatesv1.0.0Jan 3, 2026
- Changedchange_password2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedconfirm_code_from_email_for_signUp2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changeddelete_user1 field changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- ChangedgetCurrentUser1 field changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- Changedrefresh_session1 field changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- Changedresend_confirmation_code2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedreset_password_send_code2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedreset_password_veryify_code2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedsign_in2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedsign_out1 field changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
- Changedsign_up2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedupdate_user_attributes2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
- Changedverify_software_token2 fields changed
  - addedInput schema / $schema
```
Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
```
  - addedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +false
```
13 tool updatesOct 1, 2025
- First observedchange_password
- First observedconfirm_code_from_email_for_signUp
- First observeddelete_user
- First observedgetCurrentUser
- First observedrefresh_session
- First observedresend_confirmation_code
- First observedreset_password_send_code
- First observedreset_password_veryify_code
- First observedsign_in
- First observedsign_out
- First observedsign_up
- First observedupdate_user_attributes
- First observedverify_software_token

Deploy Server

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

D1.9/5.0

Scored 2026-04-18 10:55 across 13 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific Cognito operations like sign_in, sign_up, change_password, and delete_user. However, reset_password_send_code and reset_password_veryify_code could potentially be confused with resend_confirmation_code or confirm_code_from_email_for_signUp due to overlapping 'code' terminology, though their contexts differ.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming is mostly snake_case with clear verb_noun patterns (e.g., sign_in, delete_user), but there are inconsistencies: getCurrentUser uses camelCase instead of snake_case, and verify_software_token is less descriptive compared to others. This mixed style reduces predictability.

Tool Count5/5

With 13 tools, this is well-scoped for an AWS Cognito server, covering essential user management and authentication workflows. Each tool appears to serve a specific function without obvious bloat, making the count appropriate for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The tool set provides good coverage of core Cognito operations, including user lifecycle (sign-up, sign-in, update, delete), password management, and session handling. Minor gaps might include admin functions or multi-factor authentication setup, but basic workflows are well-supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Studex MCP ServerOAuth
io.github.itshivams
Model Context Protocol server for Studex tools, notifications, and profile integrations
Developer Tools
1
https://studex.club/api/mcp
Apideck MCP A
dev.apideck.mcp
Model Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server
Developer Tools
42
https://mcp.apideck.dev/mcp
mcp COAuth
com.wix
A Model Context Protocol server for Wix AI tools
Developer Tools Content Management Systems App Automation
215
https://mcp.wix.com/mcp
todo.vu AOAuth
io.github.mooball
Model Context Protocol server for todo.vu task management and time tracking.
Payments & Billing Project Management Workplace & Productivity
2
https://mcp.todo.vu/mcp

Related MCP Servers

Auth0 OAuth MCP Server
Security API Testing
pratham-svg
F
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server that requires user authentication via Auth0 before enabling secure API access on behalf of the authenticated user.
Updated a year ago (2025-05-05 06:37 UTC)
-
Remote MCP Server with GitHub
Autonomous Agents Developer Tools
danrthompson
F
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server that supports remote connections and authenticates users via GitHub OAuth, allowing them to access tools based on their GitHub identity.
Updated a year ago (2025-05-12 03:43 UTC)
-
Keycloak MCP Server
Security Developer Tools
HaithamOumerzoug
A
license
B
quality
D
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server that enables management of Keycloak users and realms through a standardized interface, providing tools for user creation, deletion, role assignment, and group management.
Updated a year ago (2025-12-01 20:39 UTC)
9
27 npm
13
MIT
User Management MCP Server
Databases Developer Tools Autonomous Agents
SufyaanKhateeb
A
license
C
quality
D
maintenance
A Model Context Protocol server demonstrating user management capabilities with tools for creating, retrieving, and generating random user data.
Updated a year ago (2025-07-25 19:03 UTC)
2
ISC

Servidor MCP de AWS Cognito

Prerrequisitos

Instalación

Configuración de AWS Cognito

Herramientas disponibles

Uso con Claude Desktop

Uso con Claude Code

Desarrollo

Depuración

Available Tools

Tool Schema Changelog

Maintenance

Resources

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Appeared in Searches