kinesis_delete_stream
Delete a Kinesis stream by name from LocalStack to clean up local AWS infrastructure.
Instructions
Delete a Kinesis stream from LocalStack
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Stream name |
Delete a Kinesis stream by name from LocalStack to clean up local AWS infrastructure.
Delete a Kinesis stream from LocalStack
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | Stream name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action 'Delete' and the target 'LocalStack', but does not mention that the deletion is permanent, irreversible, or what happens if the stream does not exist. The 'LocalStack' context is a minor addition but insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It conveys the essential action and target efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is notably sparse. It fails to describe error behavior, return value, or destructiveness. For a mutation tool, this is a significant gap, similar to the 'update_drive' example.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema provides 100% coverage for the single 'name' parameter with a description. The tool description adds no additional meaning about the parameter, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'Delete' with the resource 'Kinesis stream', clearly distinguishing this from sibling tools like kinesis_create_stream, kinesis_describe_stream, and kinesis_list_streams.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The usage is implied solely by the verb 'Delete', but there is no mention of when not to use it or what conditions must be met.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/giovanemartins/localstack-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server