FiveM Enhanced MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to FiveM Enhanced MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA focused MCP server for FiveM teams to scaffold resources, generate NUI templates, and perform safe file edits.118 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive access to MCP documentation through structured guides, full-text search, and interactive development workflows for building servers and clients.38 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching, browsing, and analyzing decompiled Minecraft source code locally. Supports symbol lookup, text search, reference lookup, and lightweight RAG.11-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that validates generated code against project structure and installed dependencies, catching undefined symbols, wrong API calls, dead code, and type mismatches in real time. It provides tools for project indexing, symbol/API checking, sandboxed execution, file scanning, and code analysis.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that empowers AI coding agents to work effectively with Minecraft mod development, providing static analysis of decompiled source code and runtime interaction with a running Minecraft instance.3172 npm14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA version-aware MCP server that provides the World of Warcraft retail AddOn API with pinned documentation snapshots, enabling lookups, searches, comparisons, and diffs of APIs across patches.12457 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: search, native lookup, platform info, CEF pin retrieval, NUI audit, manifest validation, resource structure review, security review, state bag review, performance planning, and source health. The overlap between audit_nui_compatibility and get_cef_target is minimal since one is informational and the other performs a full audit, and review_resource_structure vs validate_fxmanifest target different artifacts.
The majority of tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (search_fivem_docs, get_native, validate_fxmanifest, review_event_security, refresh_sources), but a few deviate, such as source_health (noun_verb) and audit_nui_compatibility (uses 'audit' instead of 'review'). Overall the pattern is mostly consistent and readable.
12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a specific part of the FiveM development workflow. The count feels appropriately scoped for a specialized MCP server covering documentation, native reference, platform capabilities, code review, security analysis, performance testing, and source cache management.
The tool surface covers the core workflows for a FiveM development assistant: searching docs, looking up natives, checking platform baseline, auditing NUI compatibility, validating manifests, reviewing resource structure/security/state bags, creating performance test plans, and managing source freshness. Minor gaps exist such as no direct code generation or runtime debugging, but these are outside the apparent scope.