Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FiveM Enhanced MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A focused MCP server for FiveM teams to scaffold resources, generate NUI templates, and perform safe file edits.
      11
      8 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching, browsing, and analyzing decompiled Minecraft source code locally. Supports symbol lookup, text search, reference lookup, and lightweight RAG.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that validates generated code against project structure and installed dependencies, catching undefined symbols, wrong API calls, dead code, and type mismatches in real time. It provides tools for project indexing, symbol/API checking, sandboxed execution, file scanning, and code analysis.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that empowers AI coding agents to work effectively with Minecraft mod development, providing static analysis of decompiled source code and runtime interaction with a running Minecraft instance.
      31
      72 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A version-aware MCP server that provides the World of Warcraft retail AddOn API with pinned documentation snapshots, enabling lookups, searches, comparisons, and diffs of APIs across patches.
      12
      457 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: search, native lookup, platform info, CEF pin retrieval, NUI audit, manifest validation, resource structure review, security review, state bag review, performance planning, and source health. The overlap between audit_nui_compatibility and get_cef_target is minimal since one is informational and the other performs a full audit, and review_resource_structure vs validate_fxmanifest target different artifacts.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (search_fivem_docs, get_native, validate_fxmanifest, review_event_security, refresh_sources), but a few deviate, such as source_health (noun_verb) and audit_nui_compatibility (uses 'audit' instead of 'review'). Overall the pattern is mostly consistent and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each tool serves a specific part of the FiveM development workflow. The count feels appropriately scoped for a specialized MCP server covering documentation, native reference, platform capabilities, code review, security analysis, performance testing, and source cache management.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core workflows for a FiveM development assistant: searching docs, looking up natives, checking platform baseline, auditing NUI compatibility, validating manifests, reviewing resource structure/security/state bags, creating performance test plans, and managing source freshness. Minor gaps exist such as no direct code generation or runtime debugging, but these are outside the apparent scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing