Meta Ads by Get MCP Ads

meta get adsets

meta_get_adsets

Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists ad sets for a Meta ad account, with optional campaign and status filters, returning targeting, budget, optimization, and schedule details.

Instructions

List ad sets for a Meta ad account, optionally filtered by campaign. Returns targeting, budget, optimization, and schedule info.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`limit`	No	Maximum number of returned items or rows. The declared bounds and default apply; use pagination for additional results.
`cursor`	No	Pagination cursor from previous response
`campaignId`	No	Filter by campaign ID
`adAccountId`	Yes	Ad account ID (e.g., act_123456789)
`statusFilter`	No	Filter by native effective_status, not configured status. PAUSED excludes IN_PROCESS, CAMPAIGN_PAUSED and ADSET_PAUSED. Omit for post-creation verification and inspect both returned status fields.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes	Original tool result: parsed JSON when the text is JSON, otherwise the text or multiple MCP content blocks. Provider fields depend on the selected query.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedv2.1.1Oct 30, 2026

removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```

changedOutput schema / properties / result / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "additionalProperties": true,
-    "properties": {},
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  {
-    "items": {},
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "number"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "items": {},
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "number"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "boolean"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

First observedv2.0.1Sep 23, 2026

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is known. The description adds useful context about returned data categories (targeting, budget, optimization, schedule), but does not mention pagination behavior or any rate limits beyond what the schema says.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler, front-loading the core purpose and following with return categories. It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema, rich annotations, and fully documented parameters, so it does not need to explain return values in detail. The description covers the main operation and filter, though it could mention pagination constraints explicitly for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already well documented. The description only adds the high-level fact that results can be filtered by campaign, which maps directly to the already-documented campaignId parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('List ad sets'), scopes it to a Meta ad account, and notes the optional campaign filter. It is clearly distinct from siblings like meta_get_campaigns or meta_get_ads, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'optionally filtered by campaign' implies a common usage pattern, but there is no guidance on when to prefer this tool over siblings such as meta_get_campaign_structure or meta_get_ads, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server