Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Modal MCP

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs and AI assistants to create, manage, and interact with isolated cloud-based Python environments with GPU support on Modal.com.
    11
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for monitoring and managing training jobs on Modal. Built for LLMs that need to check on long-running GPU training without drowning in log output.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for the Lattice container orchestration platform, enabling Claude Code to manage workers, stacks, containers, and deployments through natural language.
    100
    6 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for inter-agent communication. Gives multiple Claude Code sessions a shared message board, agent registry, and orchestration layer — backed by a cloud relay so agents can coordinate across machines, repos, and teams.
    8
    40 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 12 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct resource-action pair: logs are split into raw retrieval and context search with explicit cross-references, app and container management are separated, and secret/volume operations are cleanly divided into listing, inspecting, and mutating. The only close pair (get vs search logs) is clearly disambiguated by pointing out which to prefer.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a clear [verb]_modal_[noun] pattern (manage_modal_app, deploy_modal_app, list_modal_resources), with consistent snake_case including the 'modal' brand. The outlier is 'modal_volume_files', which drops the verb prefix and reads as a resource path rather than an action, breaking the otherwise predictable naming convention.

Tool Count5/5

Twelve tools cover the full Modal surface — apps, containers, logs, volumes, secrets, billing, and resource discovery — without redundancy or bloat. Each tool addresses a significant workflow, so the count feels naturally scoped for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The toolset provides full lifecycle coverage: deploy/run apps, manage their state (stop/rollback), execute/stop containers, read and write volume files, create/delete secrets plus read key names, cost analytics, and broad resource discovery. Useful missing operations (like editing a secret) are handled via supported actions such as create-with-force, so there are no obvious dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues