The org's current credit balance.
billing.credits.balanceRetrieve the current credit balance of your Geopera organization.
Instructions
The org's current credit balance.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| x-api-key | No | ||
| _empty | Yes |
billing.credits.balanceRetrieve the current credit balance of your Geopera organization.
The org's current credit balance.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| x-api-key | No | ||
| _empty | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, so description adds no extra behavioral disclosure. The description does not contradict annotations but also does not elaborate on side effects or data freshness.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (one sentence), but it merely repeats the title. Missing structure like parameter details or usage examples. Conciseness is not valuable when it omits critical information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the lack of output schema and parameter descriptions leaves the agent guessing about inputs and return format. The description is insufficient for a tool with 2 parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the purpose of x-api-key or _empty. Without any parameter documentation, the agent cannot understand how to invoke the tool correctly.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tautological: description restates name/title.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., billing.credits.transactions for transaction history). No context on prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/geo-pera/geopera-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server