update_freeradius_client

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'Update' and adds no behavioral context beyond what the name implies. It does not disclose partial-update semantics (e.g., whether omitted fields are preserved), the effect of apply_immediately, or error behavior when the client is not found. Annotations indicate idempotent and non-destructive, but the description itself provides no additional transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is clear and efficient, though it could benefit from a brief note on update behavior without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema and annotations present, the tool is minimally usable, but the description leaves ambiguity about how partial updates work and what apply_immediately does. An agent might not know whether to include null fields or how the update applies, which is a notable gap for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already described. However, the description does not clarify key update nuances, such as whether passing null for an optional field clears it or leaves it unchanged. It relies entirely on the schema, which is adequate but not enriched.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update', the resource 'FreeRADIUS client', and the scope 'by ID'. This distinguishes it from create, delete, and search tool siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that the client must already exist, that client_id should come from search_freeradius_clients, or how it differs from create_freeradius_client.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.