search_dns_forwarder_host_override_aliases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the search intent is clear. The description adds the DNS Forwarder host override scope, but it does not disclose any additional behavioral traits such as pagination, sorting, or authorization requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that states the purpose without unnecessary details. It is front-loaded and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the annotations, and the presence of an output schema, the description is largely complete. It could strengthen usage guidance by explicitly distinguishing from DNS resolver alias searches, but the core information is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so page, sort_by, page_size, and parent_id are fully documented in the schema. The description does not add further parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, which is the baseline for full coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource construction: 'Search aliases for a DNS Forwarder host override.' It clearly identifies the resource (aliases) and the scope (DNS Forwarder host override), distinguishing it from sibling tools like search_dns_forwarder_host_overrides and search_dns_host_override_aliases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to find aliases tied to a specific host override, which gives context. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., search_dns_host_override_aliases) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.