Skip to main content
Glama
gcontiero11

mcp-camara-pecs

by gcontiero11
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-camara-pecs

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • assessorai-dados by assessorAI

      assessorai-dadosofficial

      assessorAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving Brazilian legislative propositions, reading their full texts, finding related propositions, and accessing dataset releases and downloads with provenance and official source URLs.
      7
      MIT

    • MCP Câmara BR

      gvc2000
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies Open Data API, providing access to information about legislators, legislative proposals, voting records, events, committees, and parliamentary activities through 57 typed and validated tools.
      63
      -

    • MCP Senado Federal

      cristianoaredes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Brazilian Senate data including senators, bills, voting records, committees, and plenary sessions through natural language.
      9 npm
      6
      MIT

    • br-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open-data API, enabling search and retrieval of federal legislative bills and their status.
      15
      42 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (list/detail PECs, authors, history, votes, orientations). There is no ambiguity or overlap between tools, and the descriptions clearly tie each tool to its unique role.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use a snake_case verb_noun pattern with the verbs listar/detalhar, which is highly predictable. The only minor inconsistency is pluralization (listar_pecs vs listar_autores_pec), but this does not confuse the overall convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is well-scoped for a PEC-focused legislative server: enough to cover discovery, detail, authors, history, and voting workflows without unnecessary bloat. Each tool earns a clear place.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides a complete read-only lifecycle for PECs: list and search, full detail, authors, procediment history, voting events, individual votes, and party orientations. No obvious gaps prevent an agent from answering typical PEC-related queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources