Skip to main content
Glama

Setup Services

setup_services
Idempotent

Enable or disable optional app services by passing service IDs; research stays always on. Returns the updated setup status after the change.

Instructions

Turn optional services on or off (research is always on).

Use when: the user has said which services they want; ask them first. Not for: entering credentials (use setup_credentials). Returns: the setup_status result after the change.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
enableNoService ids to turn on, e.g. ['apple', 'supabase', 'revenuecat', 'github', 'firebase', 'xcode', 'maestro', 'design', 'ai', 'lottie'].
disableNoService ids to turn off (same ids as enable).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.1.5
    • addedInput schema / properties / disable / description
      Added value: +"Service ids to turn off (same ids as enable)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / enable / description
      Added value: +"Service ids to turn on, e.g. ['apple', 'supabase', 'revenuecat', 'github', 'firebase', 'xcode', 'maestro', 'design', 'ai', 'lottie']."
  2. First observedv0.1.1

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already carry the safety profile (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true), so the description doesn't need to restate them. It adds genuinely new context however: the 'research is always on' invariant and a statement of what is returned. It stops short of detailing error or partial-failure behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short lines with zero filler: operation first, then Usage/Not-for routing, then return value. Everything is front-loaded and each sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and full parameter coverage, the description needn't explain return format, and the annotations cover safety/idempotency. The always-on note and sibling routing make it complete enough to invoke correctly; minor gaps only in failure-mode behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters are documented in the schema with concrete id examples. The description adds nothing about enable/disable semantics beyond naming the operation, so the baseline 3 for schema-does-the-work applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('turn optional services on or off') and adds a scope constraint ('research is always on'). It also explicitly rules out a related sibling, so an agent can distinguish this from setup_credentials without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an explicit 'Use when' clause (user has stated desired services; ask first) and a 'Not for' clause that routes to setup_credentials. When-to-use, prerequisite, and alternative are all spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools