sieve-map
Related Servers
Alternatives to sieve-map
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal CLI and MCP server that redacts secrets from logs, files, and diffs before sending them to AI agents, with stable placeholders and token-budgeted truncation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first CLI and MCP server for redacting sensitive text before sharing logs, configs, and errors with AI tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecret management MCP server for AI coding agents that prevents secrets from entering the LLM context window by returning metadata only and using side-channel injection. Integrates with Bitwarden and offers hooks for auto-capture and leak prevention.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables macOS users to securely connect AI assistants such as Notion AI, Claude, and Cursor to their local files and terminal through an MCP server protected by a Bearer token and Cloudflare Tunnel.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that exposes data from native macOS apps (Mail, Notes, Calendar, Reminders, Contacts, Messages, Spotlight) to AI agents over stdio, currently in early development with no domain tools wired yet.8 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA tiny local MCP server and CLI that lets AI agents read only allowlisted environment variables, redacts known secrets from text, and logs every access.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct function: check vs redact text, list findings, health, issues, scan history/status, self-test, and vault run. No two tools have overlapping purposes, ensuring clear differentiation for an agent.
All tools share the 'sieve_' prefix and use snake_case, which is good. However, the part-of-speech order varies: some are verb_noun (check_text, redact_text), others are noun_noun (findings_list, health_status). This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.
With 9 tools, the server covers its core domain (secrets scanning and vault management) without bloat. Each tool addresses a specific need, and the count feels well-scoped for the functionality offered.
The tool set covers essential operations: checking, redacting, listing findings, health, issues, scan history/status, self-test, and vault execution. A minor gap is the absence of a tool to trigger a scan or manage vault entries, but the core workflows are supported.