get_comment
Retrieve a comment from Todoist using its unique comment ID.
Instructions
Get a comment
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| comment_id | Yes | The ID of the comment to retrieve |
Retrieve a comment from Todoist using its unique comment ID.
Get a comment
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| comment_id | Yes | The ID of the comment to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only says 'Get a comment'. Does not disclose what is returned, error behavior, or required permissions. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise, with no unnecessary words. Could be slightly improved by being a full sentence, but efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain the return value or handle edge cases, which is needed for a retrieval tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a description for comment_id. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, meeting baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a comment' clearly states the action (get) and resource (comment), distinguishing it from sibling tools like add_comment, delete_comment, list_comments, update_comment.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_comments. It does not specify that this is for retrieving a single comment by ID, while list_comments retrieves multiple.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ganievs/todoist-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server