Todoist MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Todoist MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Todoist tasks, projects, sections, labels, and comments through natural language conversations, providing complete control over your productivity workflow via the Todoist API.271 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with Todoist for comprehensive task and project management, including creating tasks with natural language, managing projects, sections, labels, comments, and tracking productivity statistics.338 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Todoist for comprehensive task management, enabling natural language creation, updating, and organization of tasks, projects, sections, and labels.5 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with Todoist task management platform through its API, supporting all features from the official Todoist TypeScript Client.338 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Todoist tasks, projects, sections, and labels through natural language, supporting task creation, updates, completion, and intelligent organization of your workflow.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Todoist tasks, projects, and labels through natural language. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for task organization, productivity tracking, and structured workflows like daily planning.24338 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action. There is no overlap in purpose; for example, add_task and add_project operate on different resources, and get_task vs list_tasks are clearly separated.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_task, delete_comment, list_projects). The verbs and nouns are standardized, making it easy to predict the naming for any missing operation.
27 tools is on the higher end but appropriate given the number of resource types (task, project, section, label, comment) with full CRUD plus extras like close/reopen and collaborators. It could potentially be trimmed but is still well-scoped.
The set covers all major CRUD lifecycle for tasks, projects, sections, labels, and comments, plus close/reopen for tasks. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no move_task or assign_task) but the core workflows are complete.