gangtise_drive_download

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'download' but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is read-only, any side effects, permission requirements, or output type (e.g., file bytes vs. URL). The lack of output schema further reduces transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description includes a date context note that is not part of the tool's functionality, cluttering the purpose. The actual tool description is a single sentence, which is concise but mixed with irrelevant metadata. Every sentence should serve the tool definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one param, no output schema) but the description does not explain what a download entails (e.g., returns file content, requires specific permissions). It leaves ambiguity about the output and usage flow, making it incomplete for an agent to reliably invoke.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter with description). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, merely restating the action. With high coverage, baseline of 3 is appropriate; no additional value is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states '按 fileId 从 Gangtise 云盘下载文件' (download file from Gangtise cloud drive by fileId), clearly indicating the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like gangtise_drive_list (list) and other download tools (research, summary). However, the purpose could be more explicit about the type of file being downloaded.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The only clue is the fileId parameter description mentioning it comes from gangtise_drive_list, but the tool description itself lacks explicit prerequisites, usage context, or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.