Skip to main content
Glama
MCP Filesystem Server

MCP Filesystem Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Filesystem Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI models to safely access and interact with local file systems, enabling reading file contents, listing directories, and retrieving file metadata.
      8 npm
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides secure, sandboxed file system operations including reading, writing, and managing files within a configurable base directory. It features robust path traversal protection to ensure all file interactions remain confined to a safe, restricted environment.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides secure filesystem access for AI models through the Model Context Protocol with strict path validation, file operations, directory management, and system command execution within predefined directories.
      16
      18 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants secure, sandboxed filesystem access with tools for reading, writing, searching, and managing files and directories.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides secure and intelligent interaction with files and filesystems, offering smart context management and token-efficient operations for working with large files and complex directory structures.
      21
      67
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between bash_execute, bash_pipe, and execute_command, which could cause confusion about when to use each. The descriptions help differentiate them, but the boundaries are not entirely clear, especially between bash_execute and execute_command.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures, such as create_directory, read_file, and search_files. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a filesystem server covering operations like file management, directory handling, and system commands. It includes essential tools without being overly bloated, though some consolidation might improve efficiency.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for filesystem operations, including CRUD for files and directories, metadata retrieval, searching, editing, and system command execution. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform typical filesystem tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing