form_requirements_check

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It only says 'Check if user has all requirements', omitting details such as what happens when requirements are missing, whether validation is performed, or side effects. The 'DEMO' label hints at non-production status but is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at one sentence, but the 'DEMO' tag adds unnecessary ambiguity. It is front-loaded but lacks critical details, crossing from concise to under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description provides no information about return values or behavior. The tool has moderate complexity (2 parameters, one array) and sibling tools exist, but the description offers no context to integrate them. It feels incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the parameters are not documented in the schema. The description does not explain what values 'form_type' accepts or what 'user_has' should contain (e.g., array of strings). The description fails to compensate for the missing schema docs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks if a user has all requirements for a Kenya government form, but does not differentiate from sibling tool 'form_checklist' which likely performs a similar function. The 'DEMO' tag may also cause confusion about its readiness.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'form_checklist', 'ecitizen_guide', or 'form_draft_letter'. The description is too brief to help an agent decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.