Texas Holdem MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Texas Holdem MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA toy MCP server for exploring Model Context Protocol capabilities, including resources, tools, and prompts.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to play Pokémon games by providing a functional interface for game interaction. It allows for seamless integration with AI clients to execute gameplay tasks and manage game states.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that exposes Pearl's AI and Expert services through a standardized interface8Apache 2.0

multivon-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents direct access to evaluation tools.22Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with the Test MCP Mar19 USDC API through standardized tools. It supports seamless integration via the Model Context Protocol and features Docker-ready deployment.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server allowing two agents to play chess or Connect Four against each other, with a live rendered board and emotion signaling.-
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. The five action_* tools each represent a specific poker move (bet, call, check, fold, raise), while the other four tools handle table management and login functions. There is no overlap in functionality between these categories.
The naming is mostly consistent with a clear verb_noun pattern, but there is one minor deviation. The action_* tools follow a consistent 'action_verb' format, and get_table_status, join_table, and leave_table follow a 'verb_noun' pattern. However, 'login' breaks this pattern by being a single verb without a noun, though it's still readable.
With 9 tools, this server is well-scoped for a Texas Hold'em poker domain. It covers essential actions (bet, call, check, fold, raise), table management (join, leave, get status), and authentication (login), with each tool earning its place without being excessive or insufficient.
The tool surface is largely complete for basic poker gameplay, covering key actions and table lifecycle. However, there are minor gaps, such as no tools for creating or listing tables, which might be inferred from 'login' but aren't explicitly provided, potentially requiring workarounds for full table management.