No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 65 tools
Tools are strongly namespaced by application (task_, revision_, diff_, repository_, document_, blog_, build_, conpherence_) so most are trivially distinguishable. Minor overlaps remain: revision_inline_comment vs revision_edit (which also adds comments), transaction_search vs the inline/search tools for comments, and phid_lookup vs phid_query are near-neighbors that require reading descriptions to separate.
The set overwhelmingly follows a phabricator_<domain>_<verb>_<noun> snake_case convention (task_create, revision_search, build_target_search), which is predictable. Deviations exist: version, user_whoami, diff_raw, revision_paths, phid_lookup/phid_query, and inconsistent use of search vs query (feed_query, audit_query, but task_search).
65 tools is far beyond a manageable surface for an agent, even accounting for Phabricator's breadth across ~11 applications. Individual applications are reasonably scoped, but the aggregate is too large and includes deep clusters (five differential.inline.* tools alone) that push selection cost high.
Coverage spans tasks, revisions, diffs, repositories, users, projects, pastes, wiki docs, blogs, files, builds, owners, feed, chat, and audit — genuinely broad with create/edit/search per domain. Notable gaps: no way to create a Differential revision or upload a diff (create-side of code review is missing), and project columns are search-only (no column create/edit), plus no user or flag editing.