Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to linux-cu

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to see and control an existing Linux X11 desktop over SSH by taking screenshots and performing mouse, scroll, typing, and keyboard-shortcut actions across browsers, terminals, file managers, and other apps.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to interact with Linux X11 desktops by performing mouse actions, keyboard input, and capturing screenshots. It provides a suite of tools for automation tasks such as clicking, typing, and zooming on specific screen regions.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Give Claude Desktop full desktop control on Linux/X11: screenshot, mouse, keyboard, windows, clipboard, app launch. Zero-dependency MCP extension, MIT-licensed.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local X11 desktop control for MCP clients, including persistent Python execution, AT-SPI accessibility inspection, screenshots, and recoverable mouse/keyboard input for operating real applications.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct primitives (coordinate click vs. semantic click_element, type_text vs. set_text, key vs. hold_key, drag vs. mouse_down/up). Minor overlap: screen_info already reports the pointer position that cursor_position returns, and active_window/list_windows/ui_tree all relate to window/widget state and could be briefly confusing. Descriptions largely resolve these ambiguities.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case, which reads cleanly across the set. There is some variance between verb-based (mouse_move, list_windows, click_element, set_text) and noun-based (screenshot, cursor_position, active_window, ui_tree) names, but the vocabulary is predictable for a low-level GUI primitive API.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but justified for full GUI automation, since each covers a genuinely distinct primitive (mouse buttons, keys, accessibility, screen capture). No redundant tools inflate the count.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers screen capture and geometry, full mouse control (click, move, drag, down/up, scroll), keyboard input (type, chords, holds), accessibility inspection and activation, plus waiting and focus verification. This is a complete lifecycle for computer-use tasks with no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues