mirelo_video_to_sfx_generate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must cover behavioral traits. It states synchronous execution and result URLs, but omits side effects (e.g., asset creation), auth requirements, rate limits, or destruction of existing data. Minimal transparency beyond the core action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action and output. No redundant or filler content. Every word adds value within its scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite 6 parameters and no output schema, the description is too brief. It fails to explain the workflow (e.g., needing a video URL or asset), output structure, or defaults. Inadequate for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for each parameter. The tool description only repeats two required params without adding semantic meaning or usage hints beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a synced soundtrack for a supplied video synchronously and returns result URLs. It implies the verb (generate) and resource (video to SFX), but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like preflight/submit beyond the mention of synchronous execution.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only mentions required parameters (video Input_Source and duration_ms). Provides no guidance on when to use this synchronous generate tool versus the async preflight/submit siblings, nor any context about limitations or preconditions (e.g., video format, size).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.