mirelo_inpaint_audio_with_video_preflight

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description carries full burden. Discloses estimation behavior and constraints (segment, num_samples, v1.6) but does not explicitly confirm it's read-only or non-destructive. Lacks details on what happens (e.g., no resource creation).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two focused sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No redundancy, every word adds value. Extremely concise for the information conveyed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks explanation of output (credit cost, processing time) despite no output schema. Adequate for a preflight tool but missing critical return-value context. Model version and defaults are covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description reinforces schema (requires segment, defaults, v1.6) but adds no new semantic insight beyond the schema descriptions. No additional context for nested segment properties.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool estimates credit cost and processing time for Inpaint_Audio with-video, distinguishing it from generate/submit siblings. Uses specific verb 'estimate' and resource 'credit cost and processing time'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states it's a preflight step requiring a segment, with defaults and model version constraint. Implies usage before generation but does not explicitly list alternative (e.g., generate) or exclusion cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.