fred_release_tables

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates the return format (dict with 'elements') and parameter purposes, but does not disclose traits like read-only nature, authorization needs, or error behavior. This is adequate but minimally informative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured as a docstring with Args and Returns sections. It is concise with no extraneous text, though the first sentence could be slightly more front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (signal indicates true), the description needn't detail return values extensively. It covers the main parameters and return shape. However, it omits any mention of error handling or tree hierarchy nature, which would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds significant meaning beyond the schema. It explains element_id: 'Omit for the root,' include_observation_values: 'If true, include observation values,' and specifies date format for observation_date. This compensates for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get release table trees for a FRED release,' using a specific verb and resource. Among siblings like fred_release and fred_release_series, it clearly distinguishes itself by focusing on 'tables' as a tree structure.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like fred_release_series. The description implies usage when one needs the table tree structure, but lacks exclusions or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.