fred_release_series

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. However, it only lists parameters and the return type (dict with key 'seriess'), omitting details like rate limits, authentication requirements, or side effects. The safety profile is unclear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description follows a structured Args/Returns format, making it easy to scan. It is concise enough, listing parameters without redundancy, though it could be slightly tighter by not repeating the tool's name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (11 parameters, many optional) and the absence of annotations, the description covers all parameters and the return format. It could mention that the output schema exists, but that is not strictly required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description explains each parameter in plain language (e.g., 'FRED release ID', 'Start of real-time period (YYYY-MM-DD)') and clarifies dependencies for filter_variable and filter_value. This adds significant meaning beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get the series on a FRED release', specifying the verb (Get) and resource (series on a FRED release). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like fred_release (which gets release metadata) and fred_series (which gets series by ID), among others.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings. It does not mention alternatives or conditions for its use, such as when to prefer this over fred_release_series_tags or fred_release_tables.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.