complete_synthesis_step

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses a key behavioral trait (fails if guidance not requested) and states it updates the process, but it does not explain side effects, reversibility, or return behavior. This is useful but limited.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and the critical requirement is prominently emphasized in uppercase. Every word adds value, with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a 4-parameter schema with all parameters described and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context for execution. It includes the essential prerequisite and the action's purpose, making it complete for an agent to use correctly. A full 5 is not given because it does not explain what happens to the overall synthesis process in more detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All four parameters have descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description does not add additional semantic detail beyond what the schema provides, such as formatting or relationship between parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Complete' with a clear resource 'synthesis step' and specifies the effect 'update the synthesis process.' It distinguishes itself from related tools like request_synthesis_step_guidance by focusing on the completion action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states a precondition: 'REQUIRES calling request_synthesis_step_guidance first for this step' and a failure mode if not followed. This provides clear when-to-use guidance, though it does not mention alternative tools or situations where this tool should not be used beyond the prerequisite.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.