Skip to main content
Glama
flikQ

TokenLens MCP Server

by flikQ
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to TokenLens MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • indextkn MCP server by indextkn

      indextkn MCP serverofficial

      indextkn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query live AI model pricing, compare providers, and calculate token workload costs from current published prices.
      MIT
    • OptimToken MCP by OptimNow

      OptimToken MCPofficial

      OptimNow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to fetch live, dated prices for LLM models and cloud compute instances across providers, compare and recommend models, and estimate monthly costs based on workload-specific token shapes and constraints.
      MIT

    • AgentCost MCP Server

      oneagentlabs
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides real-time AI model pricing, cost estimation, and budget management tools to help agents understand and optimize their spending. It enables agents to compare costs across multiple providers and select the most cost-effective models for specific tasks.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: comparing plan costs, simulating usage scenarios, computing break-even thresholds, and generating personalized recommendations. Their descriptions make the boundary between them obvious.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: compare_plans, run_scenario, break_even, recommend_plan. No mixed styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of analyzing TokenLens plans. Each tool contributes a distinct analysis capability without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers all key aspects of plan selection: cost comparison, usage simulation, break-even analysis, and final recommendation. There are no obvious missing operations for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources