Skip to main content
Glama
OptimNow

OptimToken MCP

Official
by OptimNow

OptimToken MCP

Built by OptimNow. Ask an AI assistant what a model or an instance actually costs, and get a dated, sourced figure instead of a number the model remembers from its training data.

CI MCP Server ChatGPT Apps Node Prices License: MIT GitHub Stars


Connect in 30 seconds

The server is hosted, so there is nothing to install.

https://ai-pricing-hub-mcp-9604f763.alpic.live/

Client

How to add it

claude mcp add --transport http optimtoken https://ai-pricing-hub-mcp-9604f763.alpic.live/

Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, paste the URL above

Settings → Connectors → Add, paste the URL. Comparisons render as interactive widgets

Add an HTTP MCP server entry pointing at the URL

Then just ask:

"We send 200k support tickets a month at about 1,500 input tokens each. Which model gives me the best quality per euro, and what would it cost?"


Related MCP server: CloudCost MCP Server

Why this exists

Model prices change weekly, and a language model's idea of them is frozen at its training cutoff. Ask one what Claude or GPT costs and you get a confident answer that was true some months ago, with no date attached and no way to tell. The same applies to cloud instance rates, which additionally vary by region in ways nobody memorises.

This server replaces recall with a lookup:

  • Live prices, not remembered ones. Every LLM figure comes from the OptimToken catalogue, which tracks 250+ models and refreshes daily.

  • Corrected prices. OptimToken keeps a committed price archive, a verified overrides table checked against vendor pricing pages, and an anomaly check that alarms on the half-price and double-price breaks upstream feeds occasionally publish. This server asks that catalogue rather than re-deriving prices itself.

  • Cost per request, not cost per million tokens. Price-per-token comparisons hide the thing you actually pay for. The tools apply your token shape, your cache hit rate and batch eligibility, and return a figure per request and per month.

  • Every answer carries its provenance. Which tier served it, and whether the prices were verified.


Tools

Tool

What it answers

compare-llm-models

"What is out there?" Browse and filter the catalogue on price, quality (Chatbot Arena ELO), efficiency and capabilities, with a self-hostability read from the licence.

recommend-llm-model

"Just tell me which one." A ranked top 3 for one workload under your constraints (budget, minimum ELO, required capability, self-hostability), each with a per-constraint satisfied or violated breakdown as the evidence. Over-constrained queries return the nearest misses, labelled as such.

compare-models-side-by-side

"How do these specific ones compare?" 2 to 4 named models across all 8 use case profiles at a chosen monthly volume, list and optimized cost for each.

estimate-llm-cost

"What will this cost us per month?" Per-request and monthly cost for your own volume, token shape, cache hit rate and batch eligibility.

compare-compute-pricing

"What should we run it on?" Compute instance rates across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, OVH, DigitalOcean and Alibaba, by region and category.

All five are read-only and take no credentials. Nothing you send is stored.

Use case profiles ship with realistic token shapes, so you do not have to invent them: Support Ticket, Knowledge Q&A, Meeting Summary, Marketing Content, Coding Task, Invoice Processing, Call Summary, Agent Workflow.


Where the numbers come from

optimtoken.optimnow.io is the single source of truth. When it cannot be reached, the server degrades in tiers rather than failing, and says which tier it used.

Tool

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

LLM tools

GET /api/llm-models

OpenRouter direct

embedded snapshot

Compute tool

GET /api/pricing?region=

not available

embedded snapshot (137 rows)

Tiers 2 and 3 serve uncorrected prices, and that matters more than it sounds. An upstream feed once published a frontier model at half its real list price, which halves every monthly figure derived from it. So every response carries a provenance object with pricesVerified, and the lower tiers put a notice at the top of the answer. A fallback should never quietly downgrade correctness.

Tier 1 is accepted only when the catalogue reports that it is itself serving fresh upstream data. If the site is on its own fallback, it carries no corrections, and this server treats it accordingly.


Local development

Requires Node.js 24+.

npm install
npm run dev              # Skybridge dev server + MCP inspector at localhost:3000
npm test                 # schema conformance, serialisation precision, data sources
npm run build            # widgets + server

The static fallback catalogue is refreshed by hand, not on a schedule:

npm run refresh-fallback

Because it is manual, check its dataAsOf before trusting a tier-3 response. An unrefreshed fallback ages silently.

ai-pricing-hub-mcp/
├─ server/src/index.ts              # tool + widget registrations
├─ server/src/lib/optimtoken-api.ts # the one base URL constant, fetch and timeout discipline
├─ server/src/lib/                  # ranking, efficiency scoring, provenance, normalisation
├─ server/src/data/                 # static fallback pricing + region maps
└─ web/src/widgets/                 # React widgets rendered in the client

Built with Skybridge, deployed on Alpic.


The rest of the family

OptimToken

The web app. Same catalogue, full UI, an AI advisor and a public JSON API.

AI ROI Calculator

Does the AI business case pay for itself. Same prices, plus harness costs and value modelling.

cloud-finops-skills

FinOps knowledge for AI agents: AWS, Azure, GCP, AI inference, SaaS.

finops-mcp-resources

MCP servers, tutorials and client guides for cloud cost work.


License

Released under the MIT License.

Prices served by this server come from third-party sources and are provided as is, without warranty. Verify against vendor pricing pages before committing spend.


Questions about your own AI or cloud bill? Talk to OptimNow.

A
license - permissive license
Not graded
quality - not tested
A
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
1Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides real-time AI model pricing, cost estimation, and budget management tools to help agents understand and optimize their spending. It enables agents to compare costs across multiple providers and select the most cost-effective models for specific tasks.
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to parse multi-cloud infrastructure-as-code files, query real-time pricing from AWS, Azure, and GCP, and generate cost estimates and comparison reports.
    57
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to compare AI model pricing plans, run cost scenarios, find break-even points, and get plan recommendations using TokenLens data.
    4

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • Verified cloud cost forecasting for AI agents. AWS, GCP, Azure pricing matrix.

  • Verified cloud cost forecasting for AI agents. AWS, GCP, Azure pricing matrix.

  • See, price, and control every tool call your AI agents make: policy checks, cost, and audit tools.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OptimNow/ai-pricing-hub-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server