Skip to main content
Glama
fireostendere

DipTrace MCP

by fireostendere
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to DipTrace MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kicad-mcp

      fsbondtec
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with KiCad projects, schematics, and PCBs, supporting project management, design rule checking, netlist extraction, and datasheet RAG search.
      2
      MIT

    • KiCAD MCP Server

      kankrittapon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with KiCAD for PCB design automation. Users can design PCBs using natural language, including component placement, routing, checks, and export.
      39 npm
      MIT

    • Coppermind

      charlesmmorais
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to design PCBs in KiCAD through natural language, with transactional preview-verify-commit workflow, undo/redo, and an engineering knowledge base.
      14
      1
      MIT

    • KiCAD MCP Server

      Avinash1286
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with KiCAD for PCB design automation, including schematic editing, component placement, routing, DRC/ERC, and export.
      100
      25 npm
      1
      MIT

    • pcb-mcp

      Amagtoto
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and modify KiCAD PCB designs through the KiCAD IPC API, providing tools for board queries, footprint placement, track creation, DRC, and export.
      44
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 167 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools are explicit aliases or presets of one another (check_silkscreen/run_silkscreen_check, analyze_controlled_impedance/validate_impedance_constraints, legalize_component_placement/plan_component_placement), and the many run_*_review profiles overlap heavily (run_drc, run_connectivity_check, run_component_clearance_check, run_board_review). Component update tools also blur together: set_component_value, set_component_fields, and set_component_properties all touch overlapping data.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_nets, add_trace, commit_transaction, analyze_placement), which is excellent at this scale. Minor deviations exist such as diptrace_status and a few alias-style names like check_silkscreen, but they do not undermine the overall pattern.

    Tool Count1/5

    167 tools is an extreme count that far exceeds even the 'too many' 25+ threshold in the rubric. Even for a broad EDA domain, this creates a massive selection surface and is not well-scoped for a typical MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers an unusually broad lifecycle: document model access, libraries, BOM, placement, routing, differential pairs, impedance, reviews, exports, transactions, jobs, and sessions. Minor gaps exist such as no component/sheet deletion and explicitly unsupported native Gerber/drill fabrication output, but most workflows have a workable path.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources