Skip to main content
Glama
ferrislucas

iTerm MCP Server

by ferrislucas

Related Servers

Alternatives to iTerm MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides full control over iTerm2 terminal sessions on macOS. It enables users to manage windows, tabs, and panes, run commands, read screen content, and interact with terminal sessions through Claude.
      18
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that allows Claude AI to execute commands through a command-line interface, enabling direct system interactions from within Claude.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server that lets Claude desktop app execute terminal commands on your computer and edit files through Model Context Protocol, featuring command execution, process management, and advanced file operations.
      19
      291,023 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with iTerm2 terminals, allowing creation and management of terminal sessions, command execution, and reading terminal output.
      5
      69 npm
      14
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling iTerm2 terminal sessions, enabling screen reading, command execution, keystroke sending, and session management through natural language.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct function: reading output, sending control characters, and writing text. No overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (read_terminal_output, send_control_character, write_to_terminal), making the set predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for terminal interaction, covering reading, writing, and control without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core terminal operations, but missing features like session management or terminal listing are minor gaps for a basic server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive