https://remote-mcp-server-authless.feraranas.workers.dev/
이 예제에서는 Cloudflare Workers에서 인증이 필요하지 않은 원격 MCP 서버를 배포할 수 있습니다.
이렇게 하면 MCP 서버가 remote-mcp-server-authless.<your-account>.workers.dev/sse 와 같은 URL에 배포됩니다.
또는 아래 명령줄을 사용하여 로컬 컴퓨터에 원격 MCP 서버를 생성할 수 있습니다.
지엑스피1
Related MCP server: Remote MCP Server Authless
MCP 서버에 자체 도구를 추가하려면 src/index.ts 의 init() 메서드 내에서 this.server.tool(...) 사용하여 각 도구를 정의합니다.
원격 MCP 클라이언트인 Cloudflare AI Playground에서 MCP 서버에 연결할 수 있습니다.
배포된 MCP 서버 URL을 입력하세요( remote-mcp-server-authless.<your-account>.workers.dev/sse )
이제 놀이터에서 바로 MCP 도구를 사용할 수 있습니다!
mcp-remote proxy를 사용하여 로컬 MCP 클라이언트에서 원격 MCP 서버에 연결할 수도 있습니다.
Claude Desktop에서 MCP 서버에 연결하려면 Anthropic의 빠른 시작을 따르고 Claude Desktop에서 설정 > 개발자 > 구성 편집으로 이동하세요.
다음 구성으로 업데이트:
{
"mcpServers": {
"calculator": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"mcp-remote",
"http://localhost:8787/sse" // or remote-mcp-server-authless.your-account.workers.dev/sse
]
}
}
}클로드를 다시 시작하면 도구를 사용할 수 있게 됩니다.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Yes | ||
| b | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | Yes | ||
| a | Yes | ||
| b | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
addcalculateScored across 2 tools
The two tools 'add' and 'calculate' are highly ambiguous without descriptions, as 'add' could be a subset of 'calculate' or vice versa, making it impossible to distinguish their purposes. This overlap creates a high risk of misselection, as agents cannot determine when to use one over the other based on the limited information provided.
The tool names 'add' and 'calculate' are both simple verbs, which provides some readability, but they lack a consistent pattern such as verb_noun or clear domain-specific conventions. The naming is mixed in style, with 'add' being a basic operation and 'calculate' being more general, but without descriptions, it's unclear if this reflects intentional design or inconsistency.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for most practical purposes, suggesting it may not cover a meaningful domain adequately. This low count is borderline inappropriate unless the server's purpose is extremely narrow, but without descriptions, it's hard to justify such minimalism, leaning toward too few tools for effective agent use.
The server is severely incomplete, as the lack of descriptions makes it impossible to infer a domain or assess coverage. With only vague tool names like 'add' and 'calculate', there are obvious gaps in any potential workflow, and agents will likely fail due to missing operations or unclear scope, rendering the tool surface non-functional for typical tasks.
Cloudflare Workers MCP server: ai-model-router
MCP server for AI agents to plan, verify, and deploy Cloudflare-native apps.
Cloudflare Workers MCP server: ai-gateway
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…