Skip to main content
Glama
feraranas

Remote MCP Server (Authless)

by feraranas
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Remote MCP Server (Authless)

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Remote MCP Server Authless

      anbeime
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A tool that deploys an authentication-free Model Context Protocol server on Cloudflare Workers, allowing you to create and access custom AI tools from the Cloudflare AI Playground or Claude Desktop.
      -

    • Remote MCP Server for

      bithou
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A tool that allows deployment of a Model Context Protocol server on Cloudflare Workers without authentication requirements, enabling users to create and use custom AI tools via the Cloudflare AI Playground or Claude Desktop.
      4 npm
      ISC

    • Remote MCP Server Authless

      blokpardi
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A deployable server on Cloudflare Workers that provides Model Context Protocol tools without requiring authentication, allowing easy integration with AI models like Claude Desktop and the Cloudflare AI Playground.
      -

    • Remote MCP Server

      waue0920
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A deployable Model Context Protocol server for Cloudflare Workers that allows users to create custom AI tools without authentication requirements and connect them to Cloudflare AI Playground or Claude Desktop.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The two tools 'add' and 'calculate' are highly ambiguous without descriptions, as 'add' could be a subset of 'calculate' or vice versa, making it impossible to distinguish their purposes. This overlap creates a high risk of misselection, as agents cannot determine when to use one over the other based on the limited information provided.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The tool names 'add' and 'calculate' are both simple verbs, which provides some readability, but they lack a consistent pattern such as verb_noun or clear domain-specific conventions. The naming is mixed in style, with 'add' being a basic operation and 'calculate' being more general, but without descriptions, it's unclear if this reflects intentional design or inconsistency.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for most practical purposes, suggesting it may not cover a meaningful domain adequately. This low count is borderline inappropriate unless the server's purpose is extremely narrow, but without descriptions, it's hard to justify such minimalism, leaning toward too few tools for effective agent use.

    Completeness1/5

    The server is severely incomplete, as the lack of descriptions makes it impossible to infer a domain or assess coverage. With only vague tool names like 'add' and 'calculate', there are obvious gaps in any potential workflow, and agents will likely fail due to missing operations or unclear scope, rendering the tool surface non-functional for typical tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources