get_job
Retrieve comprehensive details of a LinkedIn job posting by providing its job ID.
Instructions
Get comprehensive details about a specific LinkedIn job posting
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes | LinkedIn job ID |
Retrieve comprehensive details of a LinkedIn job posting by providing its job ID.
Get comprehensive details about a specific LinkedIn job posting
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| jobId | Yes | LinkedIn job ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose what 'comprehensive details' include, nor does it mention authentication, rate limits, or data freshness. For a read tool, basic transparency is missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no extraneous words. However, it could be slightly more informative without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and minimal description. Agents lack information on what return fields to expect, limiting their ability to use the response effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter (jobId). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's 'LinkedIn job ID'. Baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get) and the resource (comprehensive details about a specific LinkedIn job posting). It distinguishes from sibling tools like search_jobs (list) and get_job_applications.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search_jobs or get_saved_jobs. The description implies it's for a single job but does not explicitly state when to choose it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/felipfr/linkedin-mcpserver'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server