get_feed
Retrieve posts from your LinkedIn network feed. Specify the number of posts to return.
Instructions
Access your LinkedIn feed with posts from your network
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of posts to retrieve |
Retrieve posts from your LinkedIn network feed. Specify the number of posts to return.
Access your LinkedIn feed with posts from your network
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | No | Number of posts to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'access your LinkedIn feed' without mentioning read-only nature, pagination, rate limits, or content scope.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, nine words, no redundancy. Efficiently communicates the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It could improve by explaining feed ordering or typical usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter 'count' has a clear description and default. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool accesses the LinkedIn feed, which is distinct from sibling tools like get_my_posts or get_profile. However, it uses a generic verb 'access' and does not highlight specific feed features.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_my_posts), no prerequisites, and no when-not-to-use scenarios provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/felipfr/linkedin-mcpserver'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server